HereBlogs / Mrigank Shekhar's blog / Mathew Hayden and Greatness
Mathew Hayden and Greatness
Mathew Hayden and Greatness (or his apparent perception of the lack of it) - could probably be the reason why this great Australian opening batsman regularly makes media comments which are either blatantly wrong or are done only to invite attention.
There is something wrong with Mathew Hayden, an all time great in his own right with the bat in his hand but the complete opposite when he talks to the media. Look at his recent comments in reverse chronological order
- India is a third world country leading to misorganization (probably his reason for Australia loosing the 2008 India series)
- I have the better of Zaheer Khan (well, a few third ball dismissals lately help his cause greatly)
- Harbhajan is an obnoxious weed (blah blah blah)
- Ishant should meet him in the boxing ring (that is what he can do if he cannot play the bowler)
- And numerous others such innane comments.
Mathew Hayden, given his record, would have been any nation's icon and the cricketing focus, if he had not played for Australia. Playing for Australia meant that his greatness and media attention is shared and more importantly dominated by other greats. Starting from Steve Waugh, Adam Gilchrist, Shane Warne, Glenn Mc Grath and now Ricky Ponting, all these Aussies always rank ahead of Hayden. While Steve Waugh will be heralded as the best captain, Gilchrist the best ODI player ever, Shane Warne the best spinner ever, Mc Grath the best paceman, Ricky Ponting has taken acclaims for being the best test batsman for the last few years.
Where does this leave Hayden?
He is, and probably will be, remembered as a great opener who was a part of the great Australian test team. His name will be remembered as a part of a cricket folklore but never as a folklore itself. Imagine him playing his career in isolation, the adulation, the attention, the accolades which he could have achieved? In reality, his achievements have always been overshadowed by other dominant events\cricketers:
- He played out of his skin in the 2001 series against India, the series remembered as Laxman's and Harbhajan's and the series where the final frontier was not conquered.
- He played his part in Australia winning the 2003 WC, but Ricky Ponting took the spoils in terms of Australian batting.
- He played his part in Australia winning the 2007 WC, be=being the highest run scorer, but Glenn McGrath took the Player of the Series award.
- He played his part as a dominant opener in the successful Australian ODI team, but Adam Gilchrist, his opening partner, was voted the best Australian ODI player ever.
- He was the highest run scorer in the T20 WC, but Dhoni's team took the cake there.
- He had huge contributions in all Ashes victories, but Shane Warne always took the limelight.
- Ricky Ponting has been Australia's premier Test batsmen for the last 5-10 years and Hayden has been the second best.
- When the final frontier was finally conquered by Ponting's men, Hayden had a poor series by his standards.
All these indicate that Hayden has always ended up as the bridesmaid throughout his career, his limelight either taken by his Aussie counterparts or by the Indian Cricket team. He cannot rant againt his teammates and so he follows the next logical step, rants against the Indian Cricket team, and now India as a country in general, just to get his part of the attention, which he, truly and thoroughly, deserves.
- Flag as offensive
- Mrigank Shekhar's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- | Email this page
i totally agree with your point that in any other team, Hayden would be termed as an all time great batsman.. and its only because of other stars like Warne, McGrath, Gilchrist, Ponting, etc,, that he has not really got what he deserves..
but I dont agree with the point that he is talking bullshit to vent his frustration.. i think its more to do with the arrogant mentality of Aussies..
you might have a point for Hayden's nonsense comments, but what about the equally stupid comments made in the past by the likes of McGrath (remember that famous comment "it wont be 4-0, but 5-0" after first test of ashes 2005), Gilchrist and Ponting..
I think these guys have absolutely no respect for the opposition and they are sore losers..
No wonder, they are not big stars (as big as they should be) even in their own country..
i totally agree with your point that in any other team, Hayden would be termed as an all time great batsman.. and its only because of other stars like Warne, McGrath, Gilchrist, Ponting, etc,, that he has not really got what he deserves..
but I dont agree with the point that he is talking bullshit to vent his frustration.. i think its more to do with the arrogant mentality of Aussies..
Arrogance is ok, but most of the arrogant Aussie talk is before and during the series, in general. Hayden talks after the series gets over, realising that he still is not in the limelight.
you might have a point for Hayden's nonsense comments, but what about the equally stupid comments made in the past by the likes of McGrath (remember that famous comment "it wont be 4-0, but 5-0" after first test of ashes 2005), Gilchrist and Ponting..
Even Staurt Clark, the great one, said that Australia will India 4-0 when India went there. Anyways, they all talk, most of them talk about results etc. Hayden talks about individuals, nationalities etc etc. Boxing Ring, Weed, Third World, all this is utter nonsense, does not reek of arrogance but is more attention seeking.
I think these guys have absolutely no respect for the opposition and they are sore losers..
No wonder, they are not big stars (as big as they should be) even in their own country..
Agreed. That is why Mark Waugh will be more loved than a Ricky Ponting or a Mathew Hayden.
for hayden (and also ponting) talking after the series is that these guys are sore losers.. they are just trying to find excuses for their losses..
btw, when i said arrogant aussie mentality, i meant to refer only the aussie cricket players.. and not aussie in general..